Unmarshaller setvalidating true Number one live sex chat
In this respect i am unsure how you can create a general validating mechanism unless you keep a map of known JAXB class to Schema instance. We have resolved this issue without needing to maintain a map of JAXB classes.
Abstract Container Entity(Abstract Container Request.java:179) [stack trace truncated] Am I on the right track here?This makes it easy to read in different types of documents without knowing their type in advance. JAXBContext jaxb Context = Instance(package Name); Unmarshaller unmarshaller = jaxb Context.create Unmarshaller(); Validating(true); Item item = (Item) unmarshaller.unmarshal(new File("item.xml")); ...JAXBContext jc = Instance( "foo" ); Unmarshaller u = jc.create Unmarshaller(); Document Builder Factory dbf = Document Builder Instance(); Namespace Aware(true); Document Builder db = Document Builder(); Document doc = db.parse(new File( "xml File.xml")); Object o = u.unmarshal( doc ); can validate a document with the schema while unmarshalling.On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at PM, Paul Sandoz I'm using Jersey 0.7 and have a number of methods that accept objects unmarshalled from XML via JAXB bindings. It does not appear that the unmarshalling process is validating the XML against the schema used to create the JAXB bindings.
Search for unmarshaller setvalidating true:
Unlike inline annotation, the remote schema component to which the binding declaration applies must be identified explicitly.