Republicans intimedating voters

But it’s in a range around a half a million dollars.

The Trumps would have valued that house at ,000, six cents on the dollar.

A bipartisan group of secretaries of state is condemning a proposal to allow armed Secret Service agents at election polling stations.

The proposal has already been approved by the House as part of the Homeland Security Department reauthorization bill.

And the rules for the presidential disclosure do not require Trump to disclose all sorts of loans that he is obligated for. If you live in a state like California or New York, and you give your child a car, and you put down for sales-tax purposes that it’s worth

But it’s in a range around a half a million dollars.The Trumps would have valued that house at $30,000, six cents on the dollar.A bipartisan group of secretaries of state is condemning a proposal to allow armed Secret Service agents at election polling stations.The proposal has already been approved by the House as part of the Homeland Security Department reauthorization bill.And the rules for the presidential disclosure do not require Trump to disclose all sorts of loans that he is obligated for. If you live in a state like California or New York, and you give your child a car, and you put down for sales-tax purposes that it’s worth $1,000, but it’s really worth $20,000, they will catch you and they will send you a bill, because all of those records are digitized. They’re held by individual county governments, and sometimes by cities and townships.

||

But it’s in a range around a half a million dollars.

The Trumps would have valued that house at $30,000, six cents on the dollar.

A bipartisan group of secretaries of state is condemning a proposal to allow armed Secret Service agents at election polling stations.

The proposal has already been approved by the House as part of the Homeland Security Department reauthorization bill.

And the rules for the presidential disclosure do not require Trump to disclose all sorts of loans that he is obligated for. If you live in a state like California or New York, and you give your child a car, and you put down for sales-tax purposes that it’s worth $1,000, but it’s really worth $20,000, they will catch you and they will send you a bill, because all of those records are digitized. They’re held by individual county governments, and sometimes by cities and townships.

If we had a real net worth statement on Donald Trump, it would probably show he’s worth a few hundred million dollars. said that Trump himself received at least $413 million in today’s dollars from his father’s real-estate empire. How did Fred Trump manage to transfer $413 million to his son, Donald? So what you do is you play with the value of the property.

,000, but it’s really worth ,000, they will catch you and they will send you a bill, because all of those records are digitized. They’re held by individual county governments, and sometimes by cities and townships.

If we had a real net worth statement on Donald Trump, it would probably show he’s worth a few hundred million dollars. said that Trump himself received at least 3 million in today’s dollars from his father’s real-estate empire. How did Fred Trump manage to transfer 3 million to his son, Donald? So what you do is you play with the value of the property.

His businesses are losing money all over the place. But if it’s real estate, those records often are not digitized.And they got away with it because the IRS doesn’t have those records, and doesn’t pursue them. It’s no big surprise: Donald Trump and Fred Trump and Robert Trump and federal judge Maryanne Trump Barry didn’t get caught while they stole from us about a half a billion dollars.All of the super-rich use these tax-avoidance strategies.Section 3056 of Title 18, US Code establishes that the USSS are the 'bodyguards' of POTUS and their family. Its cherry-picking when the whole barrel of Bings are rotting right now.A federal judge this week issued a stern rebuke to big banks and the Mortgage Electronic Registration System in its handling of foreclosures and what he called a violation of a long-standing Oregon recording law. District Court Judge Owen Panner wrote in his ruling: “Given the numerous problems I see in nearly every non-judicial foreclosure case I preside over, a procedure relying on a bank or trustee to self-assess its own authority to foreclose is deeply troubling to me.” Among those problems: Gaps in ownership records and possible “robo-signing” of mortgage documents.

Search for republicans intimedating voters:

republicans intimedating voters-24

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “republicans intimedating voters”